Sep 01, 2025
Sudan’s Participation in the Voluntary National Review - Madani Abbas Madani
Madani Abbass
NIDAA Executive Director

Click here for bio and publications
Madani Abbass

Sudan’s Participation in the Voluntary National Review - Madani Abbas Madani

 

 Introduction

This article discusses the impact of the general political context on Sudan’s participation in the voluntary review related to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals from several angles. It focuses on the most important main political variables affecting it, with greater focus on the period of the ongoing war in Sudan since 2023. It also addresses the challenges that obstruct the preparation of a report that reflects the situations accurately, along with the remedies that can contribute in the future to preparing a report that correctly expresses the progress achieved or the stumbling in the path of achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in Sudan.

 

 Between the Revolution and the War

Sudan witnessed during the last seven years major political changes, represented in the outbreak of the December 2018 revolution that toppled Al-Bashir after a rule that lasted thirty years, and what followed it of the formation of a transitional government that continued until October 2021, when a military coup took place followed by the outbreak of the Sudanese war in April 2023.

The transitional period, which extended for two years, witnessed wide civil activity and a better space for the work of civil society, along with greater attention to the developmental issue, considering that the economic factor was among the most prominent motivators of the Sudanese revolution. The transitional government also adopted the concept of the “democratic developmental state” and achieved accomplishments in joining the “HIPC Initiative” for debt relief, in addition to obtaining support from the World Bank for the “Thamarat” project for social protection. Nevertheless, a voluntary report on the Sustainable Development Goals was not prepared during that period, but rather completed later in 2022.

As for after the coup of 25 October, the coup government faced many difficulties in resuming the developmental agreements that were concluded during the transitional period, in light of the absence of international recognition and the political protests that continued until the outbreak of the war in April 2023. And although Sudan prepared a report on the course of implementing the Sustainable Development Goals, it was not completed within a broad consultative framework with civil society, which began to be subjected to restrictions after the coup.

With the outbreak of war on 15 April 2023, Sudan witnessed radical political and economic changes. More than 30 million Sudanese became in need of humanitarian assistance, and massive numbers of the population fled to safer areas inside Sudan or to neighboring countries. The number of refugees is estimated at more than three million people, while the number of internally displaced exceeded nine million, more than the population of Switzerland. Also, high rates of malnutrition spread in different states of Sudan.

Economically, the war destroyed more than 75% of the industrial infrastructure, and stopped more than 65% of agricultural activity, in addition to the wide destruction in water and electricity networks.

 

 Challenges of Writing the Voluntary Report

- Division of control areas and stumbling of government institutions’ work
The nature of the war between two military forces led to the emergence of varying control areas, between the army and the Rapid Support Forces, including pivotal states such as Khartoum and Al-Jazira, which are of economic importance and population density. That affected the stability of health and development services, and also limited the possibility of obtaining accurate data, making reliance on reports of international organizations more credible than government data.

- Militarization of the public space and decline of the role of civil society
The war weakened civil activity in all areas, whether under army control or Rapid Support control. The role of civil society organizations was confined to relief work to a large extent, while their consultative roles with government institutions declined, and their coordinating activity was mostly limited to Sudanese organizations working abroad, especially in Kenya and Uganda. This made their contribution in preparing the report weak, if not non-existent.

- War economy and change of priorities
The war led to the emergence of a war economy based on mobilizing resources to support military operations, such as gold and various levies. In army areas some government institutions continued partially, while they were absent in Rapid Support areas. Most health institutions were disrupted, and their cadres left their workplaces. As for education, some students returned to schools in army areas after a stoppage that lasted more than a year, while students in Rapid Support areas were deprived of sitting for the secondary certificate examinations.

In light of these conditions, developmental priorities declined, and it is not expected that preparing an honest report about Sudan’s commitment to the Sustainable Development Goals would receive sufficient attention.

- Weak international support
The coup of 25 October and then the outbreak of war weakened international support for any projects of a developmental nature. And despite the enormity of the humanitarian catastrophe, most of the support was limited to humanitarian aid, which remains much less than the actual size of the need, weakening Sudan’s ability to move forward in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals or preparing accurate reports about them.

 

 The Way Forward

Despite the great challenges facing the preparation of an accurate, transparent, and consultative voluntary report, civil society has a pivotal role it can play, especially in providing accurate information if it regains its monitoring networks related to following up on the Sustainable Development Goals, through establishing an observatory or a continuous monitoring mechanism that reflects the level of Sudan’s commitment to implementing them. Strengthening mutual trust between civil society and the responsible government institutions can also contribute to improving the quality of future reports.

 

Conclusion

It is clear from the above that the preparation of voluntary reports in Sudan faces challenges closely connected to the political context, whether in terms of the efficiency of government bodies in accessing accurate information, or in terms of weak funding, or the decline of the role of civil society, along with the retreat of international support connected to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.

Nevertheless, civil society can still assume a greater role in the future in preparing these reports and providing accurate data, alongside regaining its position as a main consultative party with government institutions, despite the existing political and security challenges.

 

Recent publications
Sep 01, 2025
Arab Region States at the High-level Political Forum 2025 - Joseph Schechla
Sep 01, 2025
The Situation of Sudanese Women After 10 Years of the Sustainable Development Framework 2030 – Nemat Kuku